ForeTune wizard logo

ForeTune

Physics-based starting tunes for turbo, N/A, EFI and carbureted builds — a base map that runs, in your ECU's own format.

Request a tune See the numbers
Tuned by ForeTune

Real cars. Real numbers.

Every car here was predicted from its spec sheet, then scored against its own datalog. We publish the error — nothing fitted to the answer.

4engines
57,000+log samples scored
0numbers fitted to the log
Nathan's 3000GT VR-4 — single-turbo 6G72 engine bay
Nathan's 3000GT VR-4 with the hood up
Validation car

Nathan's 3000GT VR-4

Stroked 3.75 L 6G72, big single-turbo conversion, front-mount intercooler, on E85.

6G72 strokerSingle turboE85FMICDOHC 24V
Predicted VE vs. two full logging sessions
42,700log samples
+0.2avg error, VE pts
7.8typical spread
−250 = perfect+25 VE pts

From the spec sheet alone, on boost and E85 — essentially zero average bias.

See the full breakdown
Nate's '63 Chevy II Nova
Nova engine bay — twin-turbo 327 LS on Holley
Ran on a ForeTune base map

Nate's '63 Chevy II Nova

Twin-turbo all-aluminum 327 LS, water-to-air intercooled, on Holley EFI.

Holley EFITwin-turbo327 LSW2A intercooler
Predicted VE vs. his Holley log*
305log samples
−0.4avg error, VE pts
6.1typical spread
−250 = perfect+25 VE pts

Fired and driving on ForeTune's starting tables — tightest spread of any car.

See the full breakdown
Kane's Volvo 144 — turbo BP-T engine bay on Haltech
Kane's '72 Volvo 144
Ran on a ForeTune base map

Kane's '72 Volvo 144

1.6 L turbo Miata BP-T swap, Mazda 16-valve, on a Haltech Elite.

Haltech EliteTurbo BP-T1.6 LStandalone
Physics-only VE v1 vs. 12 minutes of Haltech logs
11,900log samples
+5.2avg error, VE pts
8.7typical spread
−250 = perfect+25 VE pts

Ran great on the first map — and the log caught that he was making 10.2 psi, not 6.

See the full breakdown
Walker's Fox-body Mustang
Walker's 333 Windsor — Trick Flow top end
Validation car

Walker's Fox-body Mustang

333 ci stroker Windsor, naturally aspirated, big COMP cam, Trick Flow top end, on a FuelTech standalone.

FuelTech333 WindsorN/ACOMP NX288HRTrick Flow
Predicted VE vs. his 200 Hz FuelTech log
2,620log samples
−8.3avg error, VE pts
12.4typical spread
−250 = perfect+25 VE pts

The car that taught the model: his cam card moved our part-load prediction 24 VE points. Every build sheet now asks for all four cam numbers.

See the full breakdown

Dot = average error across every scored cell · shaded band = typical spread (RMS) · every cell scored at its measured lambda.
*Nova: 19 of 45 scored cells fall inside the logged MAP range; the rest come from an earlier session.

Build sheet

Tell us about your engine

The more you fill in, the closer the starting map. Leave optional fields blank and ForeTune estimates them.

You & the vehicle

Where we deliver the tune.

ECU & fuel

Engine

Intake & exhaust geometry — optional (ForeTune predicts these from your build sheet)

Induction

How the engine breathes.

Fuel system

Ignition, cam & head

Optional — improves accuracy. Skip anything you don't know.
Camshaft, valves & timing (if aftermarket / known)

Anything else

We'll reply by email.

The car

How close ForeTune got

VE is how well the engine breathes at each rpm and load. ForeTune predicts it from the spec sheet; one VE point of error is roughly one percent of fuel.

Error by load

What the log taught us

Spec sheet